A Nashville man has taken BetMGM to court docket in Tennessee, arguing the sportsbook let him proceed playing for years after he had formally requested to be blocked. The case, now in Davidson County Chancery Courtroom, claims that the corporate did not honor its personal self-exclusion guidelines.
Dilvar Tayip says he signed up for Tennessee’s voluntary self-exclusion listing on June 16, 2021. On that very same day, he additionally enrolled in BetMGM’s separate exclusion program. In accordance with his amended petition, each had been supposed to maintain him from betting till June 16, 2026.
Courtroom filings describe Tayip as an skilled sports activities bettor who had beforehand seen monetary success. Nonetheless, he determined in 2021 to step away from playing fully for 5 years. His lawsuit says the state eliminated him from its listing sooner than anticipated, in Might 2023, however insists that change mustn’t have affected BetMGM’s impartial restriction.
He factors on to the corporate’s personal coverage, which states, “Self-exclusion is irrevocable and binding for your complete chosen period. As soon as a buyer selects a self-exclusion interval, it can’t be reversed or shortened underneath any circumstances. Removing from a state listing doesn’t alter or override the operator’s separate exclusion obligations.”
What the BetMGM lawsuit in Tennessee claims occurred subsequent
Tayip argues that regardless of that language, BetMGM allowed him to renew wagering shortly after his removing from the state listing. He says he continued putting bets from Might 2023 by way of roughly June 2025, with complete wins and losses nearing $300,000 throughout that stretch.
The submitting additionally leans on one other a part of BetMGM’s coverage, which says any wagers positioned by a self-excluded person needs to be voided and refunded. As an alternative, Tayip claims these bets had been processed usually.
As a part of the grievance, his attorneys included screenshots they are saying present wagers positioned whereas the exclusion remained energetic. One instance reveals a March 23, 2025 parlay with a $1,000 stake and a attainable payout of $7,454.55. Further data level to bets from Might 6, 2025, together with wagers of $1,454 and $750.
The lawsuit accuses BetMGM of a variety of violations, together with breaches of the Tennessee Sports Gaming Act and the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. It additionally alleges negligence, fraud, unjust enrichment, and breach of contract. The submitting states BetMGM “knew, or ought to have recognized,” that Tayip was weak after formally requesting to be excluded by way of 2026. It additional claims the corporate inspired him to return to betting and, in earlier filings tied to a federal case document, suggested him on how you can depart the state exclusion listing early.
Tayip is asking for reimbursement of the cash he wagered throughout that interval, together with extra damages, legal professional charges, and different aid.
Different experiences have pointed to alleged underage marketing emails tied to BetMGM in Massachusetts and a separate class action lawsuit against DraftKings accusing the corporate of exploiting customers with playing addictions.
In the meantime, a March 2026 court docket order reveals Chancellor I’Ashea L. Myles cut up Tayip’s unique submitting, directing that administrative appeals and separate claims transfer ahead independently underneath totally different case numbers.
ReadWrite has reached out to BetMGM for remark.
Featured picture: BetMGM / Canva
The submit Tennessee man sues BetMGM over alleged self-exclusion betting failures appeared first on ReadWrite.
