Throughout a tense Senate Agriculture Committee hearing on Wednesday (November 19), Michael Selig, President Donald Trump’s choose to guide the Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee (CFTC), repeatedly prevented taking a transparent stance on sports-related prediction markets. Lawmakers from either side pressed him straight on whether or not these markets should be considered illegal gambling, however he seemingly dodged the questions each time.
By not giving a straight reply, the US Securities and Change Fee’s Crypto Process Pressure Chief Counsel primarily left the present regulatory grey space intact, which occurs to be the identical grey space prediction platforms have been working in. And that didn’t sit nicely with the senators, who made their frustration apparent because the listening to went on.
Selig avoids answering questions on prediction markets
From the beginning, Democratic Senator Tina Smith identified that because the Supreme Court docket’s 2018 ruling, states have had the authority to legalize sports activities betting. As she famous, individuals in Minnesota are already putting bets via what she known as “so-called prediction market platforms.”
CFTC Chair nominee Mike Selig solutions query about prediction markets, which he would oversee. Defers to courts. pic.twitter.com/tX43bHCi6c
— Fairplaygov (@fairplaygov) November 19, 2025
She argued that these firms are working on tribal land with out tribal oversight and stated the excellence between sports wagers and event contracts could also be “a semantics distinction with out an precise sensible distinction.” Smith identified that “present CFTC rules clearly prohibit occasion contracts associated to gaming” and requested Selig if he would implement that prohibition.
Nevertheless, Selig refused to provide a dedication. He responded that “these are advanced points as to interpretation of what it means to represent gaming” and that he would “adhere to the legislation and comply with what judicial choices inform me to comply with.” Selig’s response echoed a theme he caught to all through the listening to. Relatively than viewing the problem as one thing the company ought to regulate, he framed it as a query for the courts to determine.
Smith challenged that strategy, mentioning that the legislation banning gaming contracts is “fairly unambiguous.” However Selig didn’t budge. Lawmakers could have anticipated some cautious phrasing, however his stage of evasiveness stood out.
Current sporting playing scandals places deal with betting conduct
“With over half of the nation’s chief legislation enforcement officers saying these contracts break state legal guidelines that we’re seeing, it’s simply irritating that the CFTC hasn’t acted, and I’ll let that be my actual query to you after my statements.” – Senator Cory Booker
Senator Cory Booker then shifted the main target to the integrity of sports activities. He introduced up current FBI indictments involving pro athletes accused of rigging video games for revenue and acknowledged that it was regulated sportsbooks that flagged the conduct. His concern was that prediction markets don’t have the same protections. Booker reminded the room that CFTC guidelines require contracts to be shielded from manipulation and warned that prediction markets threat turning into a backdoor for betting with out the accountability that licensed sportsbooks are required to uphold.
As soon as once more, Selig stated solely that courts would determine if these are gaming contracts. He added that if the markets are legally buying and selling, the CFTC’s position could be to verify they aren’t being manipulated. Booker pressed him to say whether or not he’d shut down platforms if courts dominated they violated state playing legal guidelines. Selig repeated that he would comply with the courts’ lead.
If sports activities occasion contracts are self-certified underneath CFTC guidelines, it's important that they aren't manipulated, Selig stated.
— Lydia Beyoud (@ElleBeyoud) November 19, 2025
The back-and-forth made it clear that lawmakers had been in search of a regulator who would really regulate. Selig repeatedly signaled that he’d watch for another person to make the decision.
Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan spoke in regards to the financial significance and regulatory expectations in her state, which she described because the “No. 2 on-line on line casino and sports activities betting state.” She requested whether or not sports activities occasion contracts needs to be listed. Selig stated it was “finally a query for the courts.”
“As a md of an company, I’ll at all times look to the views of the courts and to Congress, because the Supreme Court docket has stated, within the Loper Vibrant determination. You realize, the deference of the company is restricted. We’ve got to look to the courts.” – Michael Selig, CFTC chairman nominee
Slotkin then raised the problem of potential political strain by pointing to President Trump’s current announcement of a new platform called Truth Predict, which might help occasion contracts. She requested Selig straight how he would reply if Trump personally requested a regulatory exception.
Selig answered that he would “at all times uphold the legislation” and deal with any utility the identical as others. Slotkin warned him to be “very cautious about exceptions and the notion of graft.” Her line of questioning mirrored broader issues, significantly amongst Democrats, that the Trump administration may attempt to sway federal regulation of those markets for political or monetary achieve.
The definition of gaming
Rep. Adam Schiff took a distinct tack from his colleagues, asking Selig whether or not putting a wager on a Payments vs. Texans recreation via Kalshi would depend as gaming. Selig wouldn’t reply. Schiff then tried an easier model: what if that very same wager had been positioned in a on line casino, would that be gaming? Once more, no response. Pushing even additional, Schiff requested probably the most primary model of the query that if he and Selig made a private wager on the sport’s consequence, would that be playing? Nonetheless, Selig declined to say and pointed as soon as once more to the courts.
At one level, Schiff requested if he ought to perceive Selig to be “a clean slate” with no preexisting opinion on whether or not betting on a recreation constitutes playing. Selig stated sure and that he would are available in with out prejudging the problem.
Schiff’s frustration flagged a deeper concern with Selig’s strategy. By refusing to acknowledge even probably the most primary definition of playing, Selig was each avoiding hypotheticals, as nicely indicating that he intends to depart your complete query open-ended. The stance advantages prediction markets by holding issues ambiguous, permitting them to maintain working whereas authorized battles unfold. It additionally means the CFTC is unlikely to take any enforcement motion until a court docket forces its hand.
Senator Amy Klobuchar closed the listening to by elevating issues about assets. She requested whether or not the CFTC even has the staffing and experience wanted to supervise a fast-growing market of event-based contracts. Selig stated he took the problem critically and would consider the company’s wants if confirmed. Her feedback pointed to a probable future debate in Congress over whether or not the CFTC wants extra funding to do its job successfully.
The principle takeaway from the listening to was clear. Selig prevented each key query about prediction markets. He wouldn’t outline playing. He wouldn’t say whether or not present guidelines needs to be enforced. He wouldn’t make clear whether or not state playing legal guidelines apply. And he wouldn’t share his personal view on whether or not betting on sports activities outcomes counts as gaming. As an alternative, he leaned closely on the concept these are authorized questions for the courts to determine and never for the company Congress created to control the derivatives markets.
Featured picture: US Committee on Agriculture, Vitamin, and Forestry
The put up CFTC nominee Selig dodges senators’ grilling, keeping sports prediction markets in legal limbo appeared first on ReadWrite.
