Tungsten Automation (previously Kofax) is a pacesetter in enterprise software program, providing options starting from course of automation to analytics. Their doc processing instruments have been notably fashionable, serving to organizations seize and course of enterprise paperwork for many years.
It does the basics very nicely: changing paperwork from numerous sources, dealing with excessive volumes, and sending data to your enterprise programs like SAP. That is why many firms, most likely together with you, have relied on it for years.
However here is the factor: doc processing has come a great distance. You may’t depend on merchandise that power you to:
💡
1. Rent exterior specialists for ongoing assist
2. Months to study the platform and stand up to hurry
3. Pay for costly setup, upkeep, and assist
4. Have lengthy wait instances and get restricted assist
This text examines among the greatest Tungsten (Kofax) alternate options particularly for doc processing, serving to you consider choices that match at this time’s enterprise wants.
A fast have a look at Tungsten Automation alternate options
Here is how the highest rivals evaluate:
| Instrument | Predominant Function | G2 Ranking | Free Trial | Pricing | Complete Rating* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tungsten (previously Kofax) | Template-based processing | 4.3/5 | No | Customized | 43.0 |
| Nanonets | AI-powered automation | 4.8/5 | Sure | From $999 | 46.5 |
| ABBYY FlexiCapture | Superior OCR | 4.1/5 | No | Customized | 44.3 |
| Rossum | Cognitive knowledge seize | 4.4/5 | Sure | Customized | 43.8 |
| Docparser | Rule-based extraction | 4.6/5 | Sure | From $39 | 44.0 |
| Hyperscience | Human-in-loop workflows | 4.6/5 | No | Customized | 46.3 |
| Klippa DocHorizon | No-code automation | 4.7/5 | Sure | Customized | NA |
| DocuWare | Full doc administration | 4.4/5 | Sure | From $50/person | 43.9 |
| Laserfiche | Enterprise content material administration | 4.7/5 | Sure | From $50/person | 43.9 |
| OpenText | SAP integration targeted | 4.2/5 | No | Customized | 43.2 |
*Complete Rating calculated because the sum of G2 rankings for: Ease of Use, Ease of Setup, High quality of Help, Meets Necessities, and Product Course (% constructive). All scores are primarily based on verified G2 rankings as of November 2024.
Let’s take a look at every different intimately that can assist you discover the very best match to your wants.
1. Nanonets
Sure, we put ourselves on this listing. However hear us out — Nanonets is an AI doc processing platform that helps firms extract and course of knowledge from any doc sort robotically. Whereas Tungsten depends on templates and technical setups, Nanonets makes use of AI to know and course of paperwork instantly.
💡
Key options:
1. AI that learns out of your paperwork
2. No templates wanted – works with any structure
3. Automated desk detection and extraction
4. Constructed-in accuracy checks
5. Direct connection to accounting programs
6. Simple approval workflows
7. Works with 40+ languages
8. Actual-time processing
9. Easy API entry
| Execs of Nanonets | Cons of Nanonets |
|---|---|
| Begin processing with out IT assist | Unaffordable for very low volumes |
| Learns and improves by itself | Establishing advanced workflows might take time |
| Works with any doc structure | |
| Direct SAP and accounting connections | |
| Hook up with different software program with out coding | |
| Quick, useful assist workforce |
Pricing: Begin free with 500 pages monthly. Enterprise plans from $999/month for 10,000 pages.
Finest fitted to: Mid-sized to massive firms processing excessive quantity of paperwork month-to-month, particularly in finance, healthcare, and logistics. Works notably nicely for groups that have to automate AP workflows, course of assorted vendor paperwork, or deal with paperwork in a number of languages.
How does Nanonets evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | Nanonets | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 9.3/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 9.2/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 9.4/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Meets wants | 9.1/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Product course | 9.4/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: Decide Nanonets if you wish to course of paperwork with out the headache of making and sustaining templates. Our platform works notably nicely if you must course of various kinds of paperwork, join instantly along with your accounting system, get correct outcomes with out fixed changes, and arrange shortly with out technical assist.
2. ABBYY FlexiCapture
ABBYY FlexiCapture is a doc processing platform targeted on accuracy and compliance. It helps mid-sized and enormous firms course of advanced paperwork with excessive precision, providing each cloud and on-premises choices. Whereas the arrange will be laborious like Tungsten Automation, it provides greater for accuracy.
Learn Extra: ABBYY FlexiCapture Alternatives and Competitors
💡
Key options:
1. Superior OCR with excessive precision knowledge seize
2. Versatile deployment – cloud or on-premises
3. Constructed-in compliance and validation guidelines
4. Excessive-volume batch processing capabilities
5. Multi-channel doc enter (e-mail, scan, fax)
6. Enterprise system integration instruments
| Execs of FlexiCapture | Cons of FlexiCapture |
|---|---|
| Extremely correct knowledge extraction | Takes longer to arrange than Tungsten |
| Robust compliance and audit options | Requires technical experience |
| Alternative of cloud or on-premises | Larger upfront funding |
| Higher product growth roadmap | Not appropriate for small companies |
| Wonderful for advanced paperwork | Steeper studying curve |
Pricing: Customized pricing primarily based on deployment sort and doc quantity. Count on greater upfront prices for on-premises deployment.
Finest fitted to: Mid-sized firms (particularly in software program, accounting, and consulting) that want exact doc processing with robust compliance controls. Significantly worthwhile for organizations dealing with advanced paperwork or requiring particular deployment choices.
How does ABBYY evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | ABBYY | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 8.7/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 8.0/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 8.8/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Assembly wants | 8.0/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Future course | 10.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: Select ABBYY FlexiCapture if accuracy and compliance are your prime priorities, and you’ve got the technical assets for implementation. Go together with Tungsten in case you want one thing less complicated to make use of or do not require superior compliance options.
3. Rossum
Rossum is an clever doc processing platform that makes use of AI to extract knowledge from enterprise paperwork. The platform processes paperwork from a number of channels (e-mail, scan, API), robotically validates the extracted knowledge, and integrates with enterprise programs. It’s used primarily for bill processing and monetary doc automation.
💡
Key options:
1. AI-powered doc understanding
2. Constructed-in validation guidelines engine
3. Multi-channel doc receiving
4. Two-way communication for points
5. Enterprise system integrations
6. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 licensed
| Execs of Rossum | Cons of Rossum |
|---|---|
| No templates wanted for brand new paperwork | System updates could cause disruptions |
| Robust enterprise-grade assist | Slower with massive PDF recordsdata |
| Constructed-in exception dealing with | Larger value than fundamental options |
| Good at advanced paperwork | Preliminary studying curve for groups |
| Common AI enhancements | Restricted Excel file assist |
Pricing: Enterprise-focused pricing with customized quotes primarily based on quantity. Consists of SLA ensures and devoted assist.
Finest fitted to: Mid-sized to massive organizations in accounting, monetary companies, and manufacturing that course of assorted vendor paperwork. Works particularly nicely for AP departments and shared service facilities dealing with various doc varieties.
How does Rossum evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | Rossum | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 8.6/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 8.1/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 9.2/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Meets wants | 8.3/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Product course | 9.8/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: Select Rossum in case you course of plenty of completely different doc varieties and wish to keep away from template upkeep. Decide Tungsten in case you primarily deal with standardized paperwork and like a extra standard interface.
4. Docparser
Docparser is a doc extraction software that makes use of zonal OCR expertise to tug knowledge from particular areas in your paperwork. In contrast to Tungsten’s enterprise method, Docparser provides a less complicated, extra inexpensive answer targeted on particular knowledge extraction wants. The platform makes a speciality of processing structured paperwork like invoices, buy orders, and financial institution statements,
💡
Key options:
1. Zonal OCR for exact knowledge seize
2. Customized parsing rule creation
3. A number of doc format assist
4. Direct integration with enterprise instruments
5. Automated doc routing
6. Desk knowledge extraction
7. Multi-channel doc consumption (e-mail, API, add)
| Execs of Docparser | Cons of Docparser |
|---|---|
| Inexpensive beginning value | Studying curve for advanced guidelines |
| Fast setup for fundamental wants | Restricted assist for various layouts |
| Robust desk extraction | Wants good doc high quality |
| Simple integration choices | Not ideally suited for unstructured docs |
| Clear pricing construction | Restricted language assist |
Pricing: Begins at $39/month for 100 paperwork. Marketing strategy at $159/month for 1,000 paperwork.
Finest fitted to: Small companies processing constant doc codecs, particularly in retail and accounting. Best for firms dealing with 1,000-3,500 paperwork month-to-month that have to automate guide knowledge entry from structured paperwork like buy orders and invoices.
How does Docparser evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | Docparser | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 9.2/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 8.5/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 9.1/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Meets wants | 9.1/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Product course | 8.6/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: In case you want inexpensive, easy knowledge extraction for constant doc codecs, then Docparser is an effective alternative. Tungsten might go well with you higher in case you want enterprise-grade options or course of assorted doc varieties.
5. Hyperscience
Hyperscience is an AI-powered doc processing platform that makes a speciality of dealing with each structured and unstructured paperwork. The platform stands out for its capacity to course of handwritten textual content and sophisticated paperwork with a high-level of accuracy. Companies and banks, use it to course of paperwork like kinds, contracts, and claims.
Learn About: Hyperscience Alternatives and Competitors
💡
Key options:
1. Superior handwriting recognition
2. Human-in-loop verification
3. Structured and unstructured doc assist
4. Multi-language processing
5. Customized processing blocks
6. Automated high quality management
7. Enterprise system integration
| Execs of Hyperscience | Cons of Hyperscience |
|---|---|
| Will get handwritten textual content proper most instances | Takes time to arrange correctly |
| Catches errors robotically | Wants plenty of examples for coaching |
| Works with many doc varieties | Advanced paperwork want extra checking |
| Retains enhancing as you employ it | Prices greater than fundamental options |
| Good technical assist | Not for small doc volumes |
Pricing: Customized enterprise pricing primarily based on quantity and use case. Contact Hyperscience for particulars.
Finest fitted to: Mid to massive enterprises in monetary companies, insurance coverage, and healthcare that have to course of assorted doc varieties, particularly these with handwritten elements.
How does Hyperscience evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | Hyperscience | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 9.3/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 9.0/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 9.1/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Meets wants | 9.1/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Product course | 9.8/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: In case your groups course of 1000’s of handwritten kinds or advanced paperwork month-to-month, and accuracy issues greater than preliminary value, you will discover worth in Hyperscience. Stick with Tungsten in case you primarily deal with normal paperwork or want a less complicated, extra inexpensive answer.
6. Klippa DocHorizon
Klippa DocHorizon is a no-code doc processing platform that mixes AI with conventional OCR. The platform stands out for its fast setup and API-first method, making it notably interesting if you wish to begin processing paperwork with out intensive technical work.
Learn About: Best Klippa Alternatives and Competitors
💡
Key options:
1. No-code doc processing
2. Good fraud detection that spots altered paperwork
3. Visible workflow designer for automation
4. Multi-channel doc consumption
5. Checks knowledge accuracy in real-time
6. Two-way system integration
7. Human verification choice
| Execs of Klippa | Cons of Klippa |
|---|---|
| Get began in hours, not weeks | Could not meet each customized want |
| Builders love the clear API | Takes time to study your paperwork |
| Help workforce jumps on issues | Advanced paperwork want extra work |
| Nails the fundamentals instantly | Not low cost for small volumes |
| Platform retains getting higher |
Pricing: Customized pricing primarily based on quantity and options wanted. Contact Klippa for particulars.
Finest fitted to: Small to mid-sized firms in finance, accounting, and retail that want fast implementation of doc processing. Works nicely for organizations eager to automate normal doc workflows with out heavy technical funding.
How does Klippa evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
Not sufficient knowledge to do a direcct comparability. Primarily based on obtainable person opinions, Klippa stands out for sooner setup and less complicated integration. Nonetheless, it is customization choices could also be restricted in comparison with Tungsten.
➡️
Our take: Decide Klippa when you must hit the bottom operating with doc automation. Their no-code method means you will see leads to days, not months. However look elsewhere in case you want deep customization or deal with plenty of uncommon doc varieties — that is the place Tungsten nonetheless shines.
7. DocuWare
DocuWare is an enterprise doc administration platform that mixes doc processing with workflow automation. It helps organizations digitize, automate, and handle document-intensive processes. The platform provides each cloud and on-premises deployment choices.
💡
Key options:
1. Good doc seize and indexing
2. Customized digital kinds builder
3. Visible workflow designer
4. Multi-language assist (24 languages)
5. Constructed-in compliance instruments
6. Cellular doc entry
7. Enterprise system connections
| Execs of DocuWare | Cons of DocuWare |
|---|---|
| Discover paperwork shortly throughout areas | Wants specialists for setup |
| Automates total doc workflows | Advanced permission administration |
| Robust safety for regulated industries | Takes time to study superior options |
| Works in lots of languages | Restricted offline entry |
| Retains enhancing with common updates | Some fundamental options value additional |
Pricing: Contact DocuWare for customized pricing. Free trial obtainable to check the system.
Finest fitted to: Mid-sized to massive organizations dealing with plenty of paperwork throughout a number of areas. Works notably nicely for firms in regulated industries like prescribed drugs and insurance coverage that want robust compliance options.
How does DocuWare evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | DocuWare | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 8.8/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 7.7/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 8.9/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Meets wants | 9.0/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Product course | 9.4/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: Decide DocuWare once you want extra than simply doc seize — it shines at automating total doc workflows throughout departments. However if you would like one thing less complicated targeted simply on processing paperwork, Tungsten may be a greater match.
8. Laserfiche
Laserfiche is an enterprise content material administration platform that features doc processing capabilities. It combines doc seize with data administration and workflow automation. The platform helps a number of languages and provides each cloud and on-premises deployment choices.
💡
Key options:
1. Doc seize and classification
2. Constructed-in workflow automation
3. Digital kinds creation
4. Information administration system
5. Safety and audit controls
6. Cellular doc entry
7. Wide selection of integrations obtainable
8. Division-specific workflows
| Execs of Laserfiche | Cons of Laserfiche |
|---|---|
| Fast doc search throughout areas | Advanced to arrange correctly |
| Robust safety for regulated industries | Wants technical experience |
| Good at automating workflows | Steep studying curve |
| Works in a number of languages | Restricted offline entry |
| Common platform updates | Some options value additional |
Pricing: Begins at $50/person/yr for cloud starter package deal. Contact Laserfiche for enterprise pricing.
Finest fitted to: Mid-sized organizations, particularly in authorities and training that want each doc processing and data administration. Works notably nicely for organizations with strict compliance necessities.
How does Laserfiche evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | Laserfiche | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 8.8/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 8.1/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 8.9/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Meets wants | 9.1/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Product course | 9.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: Think about Laserfiche once you want extra than simply doc processing. In case you worth the power to deal with advanced doc workflows whereas assembly compliance necessities, then it may be a good selection. However in case you simply want easy doc seize, Tungsten provides a less complicated path.
9. OpenText Clever Seize
OpenText Intelligent Capture (previously Captiva) combines machine studying with conventional OCR to automate doc processing. The platform shines at processing structured paperwork like invoices, notably when related to SAP and different backend programs.
💡
Key options:
1. Good doc classification
2. Superior knowledge extraction
3. Automated content material routing
4. Machine studying capabilities
5. Constructed-in validation instruments
6. Hyperlinks instantly with SAP programs
7. Course of automation choices
| Execs of OpenText | Cons of OpenText |
|---|---|
| Good at structured paperwork | Home windows-only shopper |
| Reduces guide knowledge entry | Advanced to deploy |
| Robust validation instruments | Restricted documentation |
| Useful assist workforce | Efficiency points with quantity |
| Common updates | Wants technical experience |
Pricing: Contact OpenText for customized pricing primarily based in your wants.
Finest fitted to: Small firms processing plenty of structured paperwork like invoices and kinds, particularly these utilizing SAP.
How does OpenText evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | OpenText | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 8.2/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 8.3/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 7.8/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Meets wants | 8.5/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Product course | 7.6/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: Think about OpenText once you want robust knowledge extraction for structured paperwork and have technical assets for implementation. Nonetheless, Tungsten may be higher if you would like one thing simpler to make use of or have to course of assorted doc varieties.
How to decide on the very best Tungsten Automation different?
At Nanonets, we course of hundreds of thousands of paperwork month-to-month for over 500 enterprises, together with 35% of Fortune 500 firms. We have helped a whole bunch of organizations transition from legacy doc seize programs to trendy automation options. This evaluation attracts from our expertise implementing doc processing options throughout industries and processing hundreds of thousands of paperwork month-to-month.
We have analyzed the highest alternate options primarily based on:
- Actual efficiency knowledge from processing hundreds of thousands of paperwork
- Suggestions from firms that switched from Tungsten
- Impartial opinions from G2, Capterra, and Gartner
- Fingers-on testing by doc processing specialists
Scoring methodology*
We evaluated every different throughout 5 key parameters that matter most to organizations switching from Tungsten:
- Ease of use: How shortly groups can begin utilizing the software with out intensive technical coaching
- Ease of setup: Implementation effort in comparison with Tungsten’s template-based method
- High quality of assist: Availability and responsiveness of direct assist
- Meets necessities: Potential to deal with doc processing wants successfully
- Product course: Tempo of enhancements and have growth
Detailed scoring breakdown
| Instrument | Ease of Use | Setup | Help | Meets Wants | Course | Complete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tungsten (previously Kofax) | 9.0 | 8.3 | 7.7 | 8.9 | 7.5 | 43.0 |
| Nanonets | 9.3 | 9.2 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 9.4 | 46.5 |
| ABBYY FlexiCapture | 8.8 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 10.0 | 44.3 |
| Rossum | 8.6 | 8.1 | 9.2 | 8.3 | 9.8 | 43.8 |
| Docparser | 9.2 | 8.5 | 9.1 | 8.7 | 8.6 | 44.0 |
| Hyperscience | 9.3 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 9.8 | 46.3 |
| Klippa DocHorizon | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| DocuWare | 8.8 | 8.1 | 8.9 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 43.9 |
| Laserfiche | 8.8 | 8.1 | 8.9 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 43.9 |
| OpenText | 8.2 | 8.3 | 7.8 | 8.5 | 7.6 | 43.2 |
Key choice components
Primarily based on widespread challenges organizations face with Tungsten Automation, think about these elements:
Doc processing wants
First, consider your doc necessities:
- Are you primarily processing normal invoices and kinds?
- Do you must deal with handwritten textual content?
- How essential is desk extraction accuracy?
- Do you course of paperwork in a number of languages?
Technical assets
Think about your implementation capabilities:
- Do you may have IT groups for setup and upkeep?
- What programs want integration with doc processing?
- Do you like cloud or on-premises deployment?
- How essential is API accessibility?
Quantity and scale
Take into consideration your processing necessities:
- What number of paperwork do you course of month-to-month?
- Do you want batch processing capabilities?
- Are your volumes regular or seasonal?
- How shortly do you must scale?
Help and upkeep
Consider your assist wants:
- How a lot vendor assist will you want?
- Are you able to deal with template upkeep?
- What stage of automation do you require?
- How essential is native assist?t
*Disclaimer: This evaluation makes use of knowledge from impartial person opinions, technical documentation, and implementation case research obtainable as of November 2024. Since doc processing applied sciences evolve quickly:
- Function units and capabilities might have modified
- Pricing fashions would possibly differ from what’s listed
- Efficiency metrics might range primarily based in your particular use case
- Integration choices might have expanded
- New options might have been added
We suggest reaching out to distributors instantly for probably the most present data and testing any answer totally along with your precise paperwork earlier than making a choice.
