can produce an unimaginable quantity of content material in a brief span. This could possibly be creating new options, reviewing manufacturing logs, or fixing a bug report.
The bottleneck in software program engineering and knowledge science has moved from creating code to reviewing what the coding brokers are constructing. On this article, I focus on how I successfully assessment Claude output to be an much more environment friendly engineer utilizing Claude Code.
Why optimize output reviewing
You would possibly marvel why you want to optimize reviewing code and output. Just some years in the past, the largest bottleneck (by far) was writing code to provide outcomes. Now, nonetheless, we are able to produce code by merely prompting a coding agent like Claude Code.
Producing code is just not the bottleneck anymore
Thus, since engineers are all the time striving to establish and decrease bottlenecks, we transfer on to the subsequent bottleneck, which is reviewing the output of Claude Code.
After all, we have to assessment the code it produces by way of pull requests. Nevertheless, there’s a lot extra output to assessment for those who’re utilizing Claude Code to unravel all attainable duties (which you positively must be doing). It’s worthwhile to assessment:
- The report Claude Code generated
- The errors Claude Code present in your manufacturing logs
- The emails Claude Code made on your outreach
Try to be making an attempt to make use of coding brokers for completely each process you’re doing, not solely programming duties, however your entire business work, making displays, reviewing logs, and every thing in between. Thus, we have to apply particular strategies to assessment this content material quicker.
In my subsequent part, I’ll cowl a number of the strategies I exploit to assessment the output of Claude Code.
Methods to assessment output
The assessment method I exploit varies by process, however I’ll cowl particular examples within the following subsections. I’ll preserve it as particular as attainable to my actual use circumstances, after which you may try and generalize this to your personal duties.
Reviewing code
Clearly, reviewing code is among the commonest duties you do as an engineer, particularly now that coding brokers have change into so fast and environment friendly at producing code.
To extra successfully carry out code critiques, I’ve accomplished two primary issues:
- Arrange a customized code assessment ability that has a full overview of the best way to effectively carry out a code assessment, what to search for and so forth.
- Have an OpenClaw agent mechanically run this ability each time I’m tagged in a pull request.
Thus, each time somebody tags me in a ballot request, my agent mechanically sends me a message with the code assessment that I did and proposes to ship that code assessment message to GitHub. All I have to do then is to easily take a look at the abstract of the ballot request, and if I need to, merely press ship on the proposed ballot request assessment. This uncovers loads of points that would have gotten to manufacturing if not detected.
That is in all probability probably the most helpful or time-critical reviewing method that I’m utilizing, and I might argue environment friendly code critiques are in all probability one of the crucial necessary issues corporations can give attention to now to extend velocity, contemplating the elevated output of code with coding brokers.
Reviewing generated emails

One other widespread process that I do is producing emails that I ship out by way of a chilly outreach software or emails to answer individuals. Oftentimes I need to assessment these emails additionally with formatting. For instance, if they’ve hyperlinks in them or some daring lettering and so forth.
Reviewing this in a text-only interface comparable to Slack isn’t a super state of affairs. Initially, it creates loads of mess within the Slack channel and Slack additionally isn’t in a position to format it appropriately all the time.
Thus, one of the crucial environment friendly methods of reviewing generated emails and typically formatted textual content I’ve discovered is to ask Claude Code to generate an HTML file and open it in your browser.
This permits Claude Code to extremely rapidly generate formatted content material, making it tremendous simple so that you can assessment. Claude cannot solely present the formatted emails but in addition present it in a really good method, which particular person is receiving which electronic mail, and likewise for those who’re sending electronic mail sequences, it’s tremendous simple to format.
Utilizing HTML to assessment outputs is among the secret hacks which have saved me, that saves me hours of time each week.
Reviewing manufacturing log stories
One other quite common process I exploit Cloud Code for is to assessment manufacturing log stories. I sometimes run a each day question the place I analyze manufacturing logs, searching for errors and issues I ought to concentrate on, and even simply log warnings within the code.
That is extremely helpful as a result of reporting companies that ship alerts on errors are sometimes very noisy, and you find yourself getting loads of false alerts.
Thus, as a substitute, I choose to have a each day report despatched to me, which I can then analyze. This report is shipped with an OpenClaw agent, however the best way I preview the outcomes is extremely necessary, and that is the place HTML file formatting is available in once more.
When reviewing these manufacturing logs, there’s loads of data. Initially, you’ve gotten the totally different error messages which you can see. Secondly, you’ve gotten the variety of instances every error message has occurred. You may need totally different IDs that refer to every error message that you simply additionally need to show in a easy method. All of this data is tremendous tough to supply in a pleasant method in txt formatting, comparable to slack for instance, however it’s extremely good to preview in an HTML file
Thus, after my agent has reviewed manufacturing logs, I ask it to supply a report and current it in an HTML file, which makes it tremendous simple for me to assessment all of the output and rapidly achieve an summary of what’s necessary, what they will skip, and so forth.
One other professional tip right here isn’t solely to generate the HTML file but in addition to ask Claude Code to open it up in your particular browser, which it does mechanically, and also you rapidly get an summary. And principally get notified each time the agent is completed as a result of the browser pops up in your laptop with a brand new tab holding the HTML file that was generated.
Conclusion
On this article, I’ve coated a number of the particular strategies I exploit to assessment Claude Code output. I mentioned why it’s so necessary to optimize reviewing outputs, highlighting how the bottleneck in software program engineering has shifted from producing code to analyzing the outcomes of code. Thus, for the reason that bottleneck is now the reviewing half, we need to make that as environment friendly as attainable, which is the subject I’ve been discussing right here at the moment. I talked concerning the totally different use circumstances I used Cloud Code for and the way I effectively analyze outcomes. Additional bettering the best way you analyze the output of your coding brokers will likely be extremely necessary going ahead, and I urge you to spend time optimizing this course of and serious about how one can make reviewing coding agent output extra environment friendly. I’ve coated some strategies that I exploit on a day-to-day foundation, however in fact, there are loads of different strategies you should use, in addition to the truth that you’ll have your personal set of checks that may require their very own set of strategies to make use of which might be totally different from mine.
👉 My free eBook and Webinar:
🚀 10x Your Engineering with LLMs (Free 3-Day Email Course)
📚 Get my free Vision Language Models ebook
💻 My webinar on Vision Language Models
👉 Discover me on socials:
💌 Substack

