“Is he tremendous necessary and that is the primary I am listening to of him?” one requested. “Is it a superfan polyglot who needs everybody to find out about his favorite author/composer? Is it somebody utilizing AI to artificially increase this man’s efficiency metrics?”
The Investigation
A Wikipedia editor who goes by “Grnrchst” just lately determined to search out out, diving deep into the articles about Woodard and into any edits that positioned his identify in different articles. The outcomes of this prolonged and tedious investigation have been written up within the August 9 edition of the Signpost, a volunteer-run on-line newspaper about Wikipedia.
Grnrchst’s conclusion was direct: “I found what I believe might need been the one largest self-promotion operation in Wikipedia’s historical past, spanning over a decade and overlaying as many as 200 accounts and much more proxy IP addresses.”
A community of accounts with an uncommon curiosity in Woodard was recognized, and its actions during the last decade have been mapped. Beginning in 2015, these accounts inserted Woodard’s identify “into no fewer than 93 articles (together with ‘Pliers,’ ‘Brown pelican,’ and ‘Bundesautobahn’), typically referencing self-published sources by Woodard himself.” And that was simply within the English model of Wikipedia.
From 2017 to 2019, the accounts “created articles about David Woodard in no less than 92 totally different languages, creating a brand new article each six days on common… They began off with Latin-script European languages, however rapidly branched out into different households and scripts from all corners of the globe, even writing articles in constructed languages; in addition they went from writing full-length article translations, to low-effort stub articles, which might go on to make up the overwhelming majority of all translations (simply 90 p.c or extra).” Translated languages included Nahuatl, Extremaduran, and Kirundi.
Grnrchst concluded that “this quantity of translations throughout so many alternative languages would both indicate this individual is among the most superior polyglots in human historical past, or they have been spamming machine translations; the latter is extra seemingly.”
After a discount in exercise, issues ramped up once more in 2021, as IP addresses from all over the world began creating Woodard references and articles as soon as extra. As an example, “addresses from Canada, Germany, Indonesia, the UK and different locations added some trivia about Woodard to all 15 Wikipedia articles in regards to the calea ternifolia.”
Then issues obtained “extra refined.” From December 2021 via June 2025, 183 articles have been created about Woodard, every in a special language’s Wikipedia and every by a singular account. These accounts adopted a sample of conduct: They have been “created, typically with a reasonably generic identify, and made a consumer web page with a single picture on it. They then made dozens of minor edits to unrelated articles, earlier than creating an article about David Woodard, then making a dozen or so extra minor edits earlier than disappearing off the platform.”
Grnrchst believes that every one the exercise was meant to “create as many articles about Woodard as doable, and to unfold photographs of and knowledge on Woodard to as many articles as doable, whereas hiding that exercise as a lot as doable… I got here to consider that David Woodard himself, or somebody near him, had been working this community of accounts and IP addresses for the needs of cynical self-promotion.”
After the Grnrchst report, Wikipedia’s global stewards eliminated 235 articles on Woodard from Wikipedia cases with few customers or directors. Bigger Wikipedias have been free to make their very own group choices, they usually eliminated one other 80 articles and banned quite a few accounts.
“A full decade of devoted self-promotion by a person community has been undone in just a few weeks by our group,” Grnrchst famous.
Ultimately, simply 20 articles about Woodard stay, equivalent to this one in English, which doesn’t point out the controversy.
We have been unable to get in contact with Woodard, whose private web site is password-protected and solely accessible “by invitation.”
Might the entire thing be some sort of “artwork challenge,” with the true payoff being publicity and being written about? Maybe. However regardless of the motive behind the decade-long effort to spice up Woodard on Wikipedia, the incident reminds us simply how a lot effort some individuals are keen to place into polluting open or public-facing initiatives for their very own ends.
This story initially appeared on Ars Technica.
